<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Formally Offended (eXpletive-free version)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bentangle.com/2009/11/formally-offended-expletive-free-version/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bentangle.com/2009/11/formally-offended-expletive-free-version/</link>
	<description>The world from my point of view</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 01:19:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SilentBen</title>
		<link>http://bentangle.com/2009/11/formally-offended-expletive-free-version/comment-page-1/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>SilentBen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentangle.com/?p=647#comment-456</guid>
		<description>I agree about the mini-series issue - there should be more of them.  The only ones that I tend to see that are noteworthy are some of the ones that SciFi runs.  I loved The Lost Room (though I do feel that was very conducive to a series) and the Tin Man was a very interesting re-imagining of The Wizard of Oz.  I&#039;ve heard some rumblings about them doing another mini-series called Alice (a Tin Man-esque revision of Alice in Wonderland) which I&#039;m curious about - premieres Dec 6.  I&#039;ll have to remember to set my DVR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about the mini-series issue &#8211; there should be more of them.  The only ones that I tend to see that are noteworthy are some of the ones that SciFi runs.  I loved The Lost Room (though I do feel that was very conducive to a series) and the Tin Man was a very interesting re-imagining of The Wizard of Oz.  I&#8217;ve heard some rumblings about them doing another mini-series called Alice (a Tin Man-esque revision of Alice in Wonderland) which I&#8217;m curious about &#8211; premieres Dec 6.  I&#8217;ll have to remember to set my DVR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://bentangle.com/2009/11/formally-offended-expletive-free-version/comment-page-1/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentangle.com/?p=647#comment-455</guid>
		<description>&quot;Epitaph One&quot; was pretty excellent, especially the flashbacks, and I guess I would like to see Keith Caradine&#039;s character get revealed. I wonder what his motives are?  Even so, it seemed to indicate that Joss was planning to take the show in a more conventional &quot;us v. them&quot;/&quot;liberators v. oppressors&quot; sort of direction instead of the more ambiguous dynamic at work in characters like Dr. Saunders.  

I don&#039;t know if this works as a response to digital downloads and dvrs, but I&#039;d sort of like to see more mini-series on tv.  I like it when shows work towards some definite end. That appeals to the &quot;whole and complete&quot;ness loving New Critic in me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Epitaph One&#8221; was pretty excellent, especially the flashbacks, and I guess I would like to see Keith Caradine&#8217;s character get revealed. I wonder what his motives are?  Even so, it seemed to indicate that Joss was planning to take the show in a more conventional &#8220;us v. them&#8221;/&#8221;liberators v. oppressors&#8221; sort of direction instead of the more ambiguous dynamic at work in characters like Dr. Saunders.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if this works as a response to digital downloads and dvrs, but I&#8217;d sort of like to see more mini-series on tv.  I like it when shows work towards some definite end. That appeals to the &#8220;whole and complete&#8221;ness loving New Critic in me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SilentBen</title>
		<link>http://bentangle.com/2009/11/formally-offended-expletive-free-version/comment-page-1/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>SilentBen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentangle.com/?p=647#comment-454</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know that you&#039;d hold the same opinion about the potential future of the show if you&#039;d seen the unaired 13th episode of the first arson - Epitaph 1 - which takes place 10 years in the future. The rabbit hole goes much deeper than is currently apparent.

I do understand your point about T:SCC - I was also upset to see that one go too, buy I gave Fox a probationary period because they at least gave Dollhouse another shot. Now they&#039;ve blown it for good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know that you&#8217;d hold the same opinion about the potential future of the show if you&#8217;d seen the unaired 13th episode of the first arson &#8211; Epitaph 1 &#8211; which takes place 10 years in the future. The rabbit hole goes much deeper than is currently apparent.</p>
<p>I do understand your point about T:SCC &#8211; I was also upset to see that one go too, buy I gave Fox a probationary period because they at least gave Dollhouse another shot. Now they&#8217;ve blown it for good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://bentangle.com/2009/11/formally-offended-expletive-free-version/comment-page-1/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentangle.com/?p=647#comment-453</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know, Ben.  I spilled all my tears over Terminator: SCC, and there just aren&#039;t any left for Dollhouse.  More aggressive product placement would&#039;ve been the way to go, I think, but it&#039;s not like there are a whole load of loose ends to tie up.  

Plus, what I like about the series is the philosophical allegory, and if you ask me he&#039;s already reached his limit there (the politician&#039;s speech a few weeks ago was almost painful to listen to)...another season or two would&#039;ve forced Joss to switch into strictly character-driven stuff.  I would have kept watching, just like I keep watching and enjoying Dexter.  I&#039;d watch because I felt invested, but I doubt it could remain as densely interesting as it&#039;s been.

So cheer up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know, Ben.  I spilled all my tears over Terminator: SCC, and there just aren&#8217;t any left for Dollhouse.  More aggressive product placement would&#8217;ve been the way to go, I think, but it&#8217;s not like there are a whole load of loose ends to tie up.  </p>
<p>Plus, what I like about the series is the philosophical allegory, and if you ask me he&#8217;s already reached his limit there (the politician&#8217;s speech a few weeks ago was almost painful to listen to)&#8230;another season or two would&#8217;ve forced Joss to switch into strictly character-driven stuff.  I would have kept watching, just like I keep watching and enjoying Dexter.  I&#8217;d watch because I felt invested, but I doubt it could remain as densely interesting as it&#8217;s been.</p>
<p>So cheer up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

