<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bentangle &#187; HBO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bentangle.com/tags/hbo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bentangle.com</link>
	<description>The world from my point of view</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 05:56:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Journey to the Center of My Lack of Suspended Disbelief</title>
		<link>http://bentangle.com/2009/08/journey-to-the-center-of-my-lack-of-suspended-disbelief/</link>
		<comments>http://bentangle.com/2009/08/journey-to-the-center-of-my-lack-of-suspended-disbelief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SilentBen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brendan Fraser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cinemax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journey to the Center of the Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Matrix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentangle.com/?p=570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is sad what you will resort to watching when you are bored.  For instance, this weekend I found myself watching the recent production of Journey to the Center of the Earth.  In theory, all the necessary elements are there:  science-fiction &#8211; check; action/adventure &#8211; check; semi-respectable actor who could be believable in such a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is sad what you will resort to watching when you are bored.  For instance, this weekend I found myself watching the recent production of <strong><em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0373051/" target="_blank">Journey to the Center of the Earth</a>.  <span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-style: normal;">In theory, all the necessary elements are there:  science-fiction &#8211; check; action/adventure &#8211; check; semi-respectable actor who could be believable in such a role &#8211; check; reasonably hot actress to co-star &#8211; check; script loosely based on a popular novel &#8211; check.  So what exactly didn&#8217;t I like about this movie?  Oh yeah &#8211; it sucked.</span></span></em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-style: normal;">Granted, the only reason I started watching it was because I was up, bored, and recently enjoying HBO &amp; Cinemax for free for 3 months (thank you FiOS!).  But in hindsight, unlocking a few more levels and extras in Lego Batman would have been a more enjoyable use of my time.   And yet as much as my summary review is that this movie was not even worth what I paid for it (time counts), I still found myself watching it to completion &#8211; which suggests there was something redeeming about it &#8230; somewhere.</span></span></em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-style: normal;">I missed the intro due to timing of my channel surfing and came into it with Brendan Fraser and his nephew already introducing themselves to their near-future travel companion.  Luckily it was not hard to get up to speed.  The action was compelling, some of the humor was mildly witty, and the underground world was certainly a spectacle.  But I think what made this movie more pyrite than gold was that it was merely beyond belief.  Sure, I expect a certain level of hard-to-swallow in a sci-fi flick &#8211; it goes without saying.  But there are levels and costs and I think there should be a point system setup to pre-determine whether such a film will succeed. </span></span></em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-style: normal;">For example, the latest <strong><em>Indiana Jones </em></strong>movie was not nearly the best in the series &#8211; quite possibly the worst.  But I personally was able to overlook a lot of its flaws due to the franchise to which it is associated (as were many other fans).  But I couldn&#8217;t  do the same for a film with no street cred.  <strong><em>The Matrix</em></strong> had no street cred, but was so compelling it almost pulled off a hat trick (then managed to trip and fall on its face).  <strong><em>Journey </em></strong>has a minute amount of cred due to the book association, but not enough to forgive the lack of a believeable plot.  An unknown world filled with unusual and long extinct creatures miles below the surface of the Earth &#8211; expected and acceptable.  Falling into/flying out of said realm at break-neck speeds and landing in a pool of water/hillside vineyard without, um, dying &#8211; not so likely.</span></span></em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-style: normal;">Anyway, bottom line is that I need some new hobbies and to learn not to rubberneck when it comes to movies.  Besides, I&#8217;m sure there was something equally badly written with way more redeeming qualities at that hour on one of the Cinemax channels.  But sometimes curiosity can get the best of me &#8211; and you know what they say about that.</span></span></em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentangle.com/2009/08/journey-to-the-center-of-my-lack-of-suspended-disbelief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

