<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bentangle &#187; liberal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bentangle.com/tags/liberal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bentangle.com</link>
	<description>The world from my point of view</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 05:56:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Call to Arms</title>
		<link>http://bentangle.com/2008/10/a-call-to-arms/</link>
		<comments>http://bentangle.com/2008/10/a-call-to-arms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SilentBen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-american]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leftist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reactionary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentangle.com/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that given my liberal stance, to some I may not be considered American enough to make such a statement.  Which is what compels me to direct your attention to something that my better half wrote that everyone should read and consider.  She at least has taken a positive position on this matter.  Part [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that given my liberal stance, to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vbw4pdxVSOg" target="_blank">some</a> I may not be considered American enough to make such a statement.  Which is what compels me to direct your attention to something that my better half wrote that everyone should <a href="http://www.dtemama.com/?p=138" target="_blank">read and consider</a>.  She at least has taken a positive position on this matter.  Part of me is compelled to use this forum of mine to sling mud back in the other direction.  But I am doing my best to rise above such inclinations.<span id="more-163"></span></p>
<p>In the least, we all need to realize that the fact that we don&#8217;t agree on everything is not only ok, it is essential to our progress on so many levels.  Without conflict, there is no drive.  Without disagreement, there is no discussion.  We should not be striving for equalibrium, but for growth.  If we start to assume that the answers to the problems of today need be no different than those of yesterday or tomorrow, then we have lost sight of things and any answer developed under such pretenses is bound to fail.</p>
<p>I cannot find the quote I&#8217;m looking for, but I read a quote once that went something to the effect of this:  <em>One man has no more right to extinguish the voice of the rest of the world than the world has to extinguish the voice of one man.</em> (if anyone knows what quote I&#8217;m looking for here, please help me out)  While I agree that every person is entitled to their own opinions and the expression thereof, when said opinions enfringe upon the freedoms and rights of others I don&#8217;t think such opinions need be broadcast and the media in this nation needs to be careful to what extent they allow these voices to be heard.  I accept that in this nation we have separatists and reactionary factions just as we have anarchists, racists, liberals, socialists, fundamentalists, etc.  But we don&#8217;t need another witch hunt in this nation.  If your state or district is represented by someone who might hold such values as to startup a new era of McCarthyism, you best do your part to see that your vote reflects the representation in which you believe.</p>
<p>Again &#8211; <a href="http://www.dtemama.com/?p=138" target="_blank">read and consider</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentangle.com/2008/10/a-call-to-arms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unintentional Sponsorship</title>
		<link>http://bentangle.com/2008/09/unintentional-sponsorship/</link>
		<comments>http://bentangle.com/2008/09/unintentional-sponsorship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 04:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SilentBen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentangle.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was reviewing my home page tonight and I couldn&#8217;t help but notice that every ad that was displayed on it was politically-oriented.  This, in and of itself, didn&#8217;t surprise me &#8211; most of the posts I&#8217;ve written in the past 2 weeks have been related to coverage of the conventions and the candidates.  The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reviewing my home page tonight and I couldn&#8217;t help but notice that every ad that was displayed on it was politically-oriented.  This, in and of itself, didn&#8217;t surprise me &#8211; most of the posts I&#8217;ve written in the past 2 weeks have been related to coverage of the conventions and the candidates.  The detail that I found personally disturbing, though, was that most of these ads seemed to mention McCain and/or Palin (or if they mentioned Obama, it seemed negatively tinged).  <span id="more-122"></span></p>
<p>If there is one thing these last 2 weeks has cemented in my mind, it is that I am fairly liberal-minded.  I have known that already, but if there was any doubt.  Whatever doubt Obama hadn&#8217;t extinguished, Palin finished off (Jon Stewart helped a bit, too).  But I guess because I spent more time talking about the negatives and the issues that I took with what I heard of late, the code that tries to figure out what keywords to base advertising on saw a saturation of GOP-related information.  I guess if I was eagerly committed to shifing this tide, I could just write a whole paragraph or 2 of Barrack Obama over and over again (or I could actually write something positive about him &#8230; worth considering).  But I&#8217;m not that petty &#8211; after all, the advertisers are paying me, not vice versa.  So if a couple of pennies from McCain&#8217;s warchest end up trickling into this liberal&#8217;s bank account, so be it.  I mean, if by some chance he manages to get elected, I&#8217;m a long way from that $5 million middle-class mark so I&#8217;ve better start working on getting there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bentangle.com/2008/09/unintentional-sponsorship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

